Gonzales v. Friend
Plaintiff: Andres Marrero Gonzales
Defendant: Warden Martin Friend
Case Number: 5:2021cv00045
Filed: February 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff must file the required documents on or before April 1,2021. No further extensions will be granted. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/15/2021) (bmh)
March 15, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Mar 15 11:40:54 CDT 2021 (crt)
March 9, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #4 Order filed by Andres Marrero Gonzales. (bdg)
February 23, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Feb 23 08:21:18 CST 2021 (crt)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court finds that Petitioner's claims concerning the conditions of his confinement are not cognizable in a petition for writ of habeas corpus, but instead, should be considered in a separate civil rights action. The Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a certificate of inmate trust account, and a prisoner civil right complaint form marked "Amended," and bearing the cause number assigned to the new case. (Clerk mailed all documents instructed to send to Plaintiff.) (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 2/22/2021) (bdg)
February 22, 2021 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg)
February 22, 2021 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg)
February 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin Friend filed by Andres Marrero Gonzales. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg)
February 22, 2021 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Also mailed IFP application, certificate of inmate trust fund and authorization form, and complaint marked "Amended Complaint," Civil Action Number 5:21-CV-00045-C. Mon Feb 22 14:32:37 CST 2021 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzales v. Friend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Martin Friend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andres Marrero Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?