Graves v. Gaines County et al
Daniel Graves |
Gaines County and Gaines County Jail |
5:2021cv00147 |
July 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam R Cummings |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Mail returned as undeliverable. #8 Judgment, #7 Order of Dismissal or Administrative Closure, received back from Daniel Graves as RTS - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (bdg) |
Filing 9 Mail returned as undeliverable RE: #4 Order Directing Full Payment and #5 Order And Notice of Deficiency, which were received back from Daniel Graves as RTS - No Such Number; UTF. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (handwriting on envelope illegible) (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Mon Aug 9 10:56:16 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 8 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-styled and -numberedcivil action be DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 8/8/2021) (krr) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Having failed to comply with the Court's Orders of July 20, 2021, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 8/8/2021) (krr) |
Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable RE: #1 Complaint, #2 Consent, and #3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party, which were received back from Daniel Graves as RTS - No Such Number. Handwriting illegible on envelope. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (krr) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court hereby sua sponte ORDERS that Plaintiff file an amended complaint, by no later than 14 days from the date of this Order, therein satisfying the pleading standards imposed by Federal Rule of civil Procedure 8(a). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 7/20/2021) (krr) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Having reviewed the docket in the above-styled and -numbered civil action, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintifi by no later than l4 days from the date of this Order, pay the applicable filing fee of $402.00 orfile an application to proceed informa pauperis. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 7/20/2021) (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Tue Jul 20 11:42:41 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Daniel Graves. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Mon Jul 12 11:49:10 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.