Ogeda v. Furlow et al
Isaac Ogeda |
Philip Mack Furlow and Reed A Filley |
5:2021cv00164 |
August 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam R Cummings |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE to the Court filed by Isaac Ogeda. (bdg) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to the Court filed by Isaac Ogeda. (bdg) |
Filing 8 PLRA FILING FEE ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff is assessed partial filing fee in amount of $53.82 with a balance of $296.18 remaining. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/23/2021) (bdg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Also mailed a copy of Order - Doc. No. 8 to Garza County Jail - Attention: Inmate Accounting Officer. Mon Aug 23 13:55:36 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Trust Account by Isaac Ogeda Garza County Jail # 16335. (bdg) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Consent by Isaac Ogeda to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bdg) |
Filing 5 FILING FEE DEFICIENCY ORDER: The Court finds that Plaintiff should within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, pay the filing fee of $400.00 or file with the Clerk the following: A signed copy of the AUTHORIZATION portion of the Certificate of Inamte Trust Account or a signed copy of any consent form or authorization that the institutuion having custody of Plaintiff requires to allow it to access a prisoner's inmate trust fund account, to collect funds from the account, and to pay those funds to the Clerk of the District Court. Failure to file the required documents will result in a denial of In forma pauperis status and dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint for want of prosecution without further notice, unless the filing fee of $400.00 is timely paid. The Clerk Shall mail a copy of Plaintiff's Certificate of Inamt Account (Doc. 2) along with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff must sign the authorization portion and return it to the Clerk within 20 days. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/11/2021) (lkw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Copy of document 2 sent along with Order Wed Aug 11 11:36:05 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Isaac Ogeda (bdg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reed A Filley, Philip Mack Furlow filed by Isaac Ogeda. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3,4. Wed Aug 4 10:07:12 CDT 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.