Nelson v. Straughn et al
| Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson |
| FNU 5:21-CV-295 Straughn and FNU 5:21-CV-295 Rodriguez |
| 5:2021cv00295 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Dismissal filed by Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson (bdg) |
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Petitioner filed a "Voluntary Dismissal Motion." Dkt. No. #9 . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) permits a petitioner to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer. The Court finds that Petitioner's motion serves as a self-executing notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a). This case is now closed, and any pending motions are terminated. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 1/5/2022) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Also mailed copy of NEF - Doc. No. 10 Wed Jan 5 14:42:57 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bdg) |
| Filing 9 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL MOTION filed by Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson. (krr) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Recusal filed by Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson (bdg) |
| Filing 7 ***DISREGARD FILED IN INCORRECT CASE*** MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson (bdg) Modified and motion termed on 1/4/2022 (lkw). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #2 Motion for TRO. Petitioner has failed to meet the elements required to justify the issuance of a preliminary injunction or TRO. Moreover, Petitioner's request for a general TRO against the TDCJ-CID and all its employees is not narrowly drawn. Thus, it is not permitted under the PLRA. For these reasons, Petitioner's request for TRO is denied. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 12/2/2021) (bmh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Dec 2 11:48:09 CST 2021 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certificate of inmate trust account by January 3, 2022 (30 days). Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Forms necessary to comply with this order are available in the law library of the prison unit in which Petitioner is confined. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 12/1/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bmh) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (bmh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson. (bmh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bmh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,4. Tue Nov 30 13:08:41 CST 2021 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
