Redeemer Church of Lubbock v. Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
| Redeemer Church of Lubbock |
| Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. |
| Mary Burdin |
| 5:2022cv00041 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| D Gordon Bryant |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order by Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.. (Bruning, Lindsey) |
| Filing 9 Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary filed by Mary Burdin. Attorneys in Attendance: MARIA GERGUIS AND LINDSEY BRUNNING. Prv Fee: $ 1600. Outcome of ADR: Continuing to work with parties to reach a settlement. (Burdin, Mary) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO SUBMIT JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Proposed Scheduling Order Due by 05/09/2022. If this case is not settled or otherwise resolved before May 9, 2022, the "Joint Proposed Scheduling Order Due Date," then the parties must submit a Joint Proposed Scheduling Order that contains the matters set out in Section V. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. on 4/7/2022) (krr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff Redeemer Church of Lubbock's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. ECF No. #3 . Having considered the motion, procedural posture of the case, and applicable law, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. Plaintiff may proceed without local counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. on 4/5/2022) (krr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 4/4/2022) (krr)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Redeemer Church of Lubbock. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Gerguis, Maria) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Redeemer Church of Lubbock. (Gerguis, Maria) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Redeemer Church of Lubbock (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gerguis, Maria) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12662220) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) A, #4 Exhibit(s) B, #5 Exhibit(s) C, #6 Exhibit(s) D) (Bruning, Lindsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
