Fawehinmi v. Chapa
| Pelumi Folarin Fawehinmi |
| Rachel Chapa |
| 5:2022cv00050 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Status Request by Pelumi Folarin Fawehinmi and Request for Docket Sheet. Courtesy copy of docket sheet mailed to Petitioner. (bdg) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: Respondent is directed to file an answer to Petitioner's petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Applicable issues must be raised in the answer filed by Respondent. No extensions. Respondent shall mail a copy of the answer with a copy of any supporting briefs to the Petitioner or his attorney of record. Respondent shall file a certificate with the Clerk evidencing such service. All records must be filed with the Clerk within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner's response to Respondent's answer to be filed within (30) days from the date shown on Respondent's certificate of service. Copies of all pleadings, motions, and orders will be served electronically upon the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and by prior agreement of the Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District of Texas. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner or his attorney of record. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 4/4/2022) (bmh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Apr 4 10:16:03 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (lkw) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (lkw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Pelumi Folarin Fawehinmi. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number LU012500) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (lkw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Mar 30 10:06:52 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fawehinmi v. Chapa | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Pelumi Folarin Fawehinmi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Rachel Chapa | |
| Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
