Simplot AB Retail Sub., Inc. v. Jake & Helen Redecop, et al
| Simplot AB Retail Sub., Inc. |
| Jake & Helen Redecop, Jacob Zachirias Redecop and Helena Wall Redecop |
| 5:2022cv00094 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Contract: Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DEFAULT JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff recovers judgment against Defendants for the principal sum of $83,881.99, accrued pre-judgment interest through May 28, 2022 in the amount of $13,634.75, expenses in the amount of $965.67, and attorney's fees in the amount of $7,875.00 for a total judgment of $106,357.41; plus post-judgment interest per annum from the date of this judgment forward until paid. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff is allowed all writs and processes as may be necessary in the enforcement and collection of this judgment. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all relief not specifically granted herein is denied. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this judgment finally disposes of all claims and all parties and is appealable. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 6/23/2022) (bdg)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Default Judgment against All Defendants filed by Simplot AB Retail Sub., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Proposed Order) (Stephens, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to all Defendants. (krr) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Entry of Default filed by Simplot AB Retail Sub., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s), #2 Proposed Order) (Stephens, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to All Defendants. (Stephens, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (bdg) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Simplot AB Retail Sub., Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Stephens, John) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/23/2022) (bdg). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Simplot AB Retail Sub., Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12842969) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Cover Sheet) (Stephens, John) (Attachment 2 replaced on 5/23/2022) (bdg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
