Bates v. Rowe et al
| Kevin Kelly Joe Bates |
| Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Chief Deputy, L.E. Mike Reed, Chief Deputy Codey Scott, Sgt NFN Tidwell, Officer DRT Mr. NFN Lara, Corporal NFN Basas and Officer DRT Mr. NFN Garza |
| 5:2022cv00102 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| D Gordon Bryant |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING: The hearing shall be held via telephone conference on August 18, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. LCDC officials are instructed to have Plaintiff present in a room with telephone capabilities. The Court will call LCDC officials in advance of the hearing to set-up the phone conference. All discovery is stayed and no amendments to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be filed without Court approval. Clerk mailed a copy of this Order to the above-listed entities and/or officials. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 7/20/2022) (bmh)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Clerk mailed a copy of this Order to the above-listed entities and/or officials. Wed Jul 20 16:15:16 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE filed by Kevin Kelly Joe Bates re: #12 Order on Motion for Injunction Relief (bdg)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #10 Motion for Injunction. Because Bates did not provide notice to Defendants or exhaust his administrative remedies, and he has failed to establish at least two of the four elements required for obtaining a preliminary injunction or TRO, the undersigned DENIES his request for injunctive relief. ECF No. 10. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 6/23/2022) (bdg)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Thu Jun 23 10:12:34 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Administrative Records re: #8 received from Lubbock County and maintained in Judge's chambers. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 11
Prisoner Consent by Kevin Kelly Joe Bates to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Injunction Relief filed by Kevin Kelly Joe Bates. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 9
Prisoner Consent by Kevin Kelly Joe Bates to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FOR AUTHENTICATED RECORDS: It is ORDERED that the entities and/or officials listed in this Order shall provide the Court with authenticated and verified copies of any and all records pertaining to the specific allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint and any amended complaint. An authorized custodian of the records must execute the attached Certification of Business Records (Certification) and attach the executed Certification to the records provided to the Court. The records and executed Certification must be returned to the Court on or before July 7, 2022. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order and Plaintiff's Complaint and any amended complaint to the listed addresses. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 6/7/2022) (bdg)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction. (Clerk to send Consent Form as directed.) If appropriate, party(ies) should return the signed consent form to the clerk within thirty (30) from receipt of this notice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 6/7/2022) (Attachments: #1 Misc. Order 14) (bdg)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Also mailed a copy of Order - Doc. No. 8 and Complaint to Lubbock County Detention Center - Records Department and Jennifer Irlbeck - Asst. District Attorney Tue Jun 7 11:55:37 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING THE CASE TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr for all further proceedings. Judge James Wesley Hendrix no longer assigned to case. This case will now be numbered Civil Action No. 5:22-CV-00102-BQ. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/6/2022) (bmh)
|
|
Filing 5
PLRA FILING FEE ORDER: Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 in monthly installments. Clerk mailed this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/6/2022) (bmh)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Mon Jun 6 13:28:26 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Kevin Kelly Joe Bates (bdg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kevin Kelly Joe Bates. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3,4. Thu Jun 2 14:35:40 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
