Reed v. Thomas et al
| Cheryl Reed |
| NFN Thomas and NFN Bibins |
| 5:2022cv00143 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT : IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/8/2022) (bmh)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case cannot proceed because Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint and either pay the required filing fee or file the required IFP documents. Additionally, her current address is unknown, so the Court has no way of communicating with her. As a result, the Court finds that the civil-rights complaint must be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Judgment will be entered accordingly. All relief not expressly granted is denied, and any pending motions are denied. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/8/2022) (bmh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Mon Aug 8 11:19:10 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable RE: 5 Order, which was received back from Cheryl Reed as RTS/UTF - Attempted; Not Known - " Must have inmate number; more than one person with the same name". No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (krr) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 7/11/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
|
Filing 1
Order to Sever. The parties are notified that all future docketing related to the severed matter should be entered in this new case: 5:22-cv-143. Plaintiff shall, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, either pay the filing fee of $402.00, or file the following with the Clerk: a signed Application to Proceed ln Forma Pauperis; a copy of her inmate trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint (certified), and a signed copy of the AUTHORIZATION portion of the Certificate of Inmate Trust Account or a signed copy of any consent form or authorization that the institution having custody of Plaintiff requires to allow it to access a prisoner's inmate trust fund account, to collect funds from the account, and to pay those funds to the Clerk of the District Court. In addition, each plaintiff shall, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, file an Amended Complaint setting forth her specific claims. Each plaintiff shall use the form provided by the Court and shall answer each question, setting forth her entire complaint on the form unless it is necessary to attach additional pages The Clerk shall mail to each of the Plaintiffs a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form marked, "Amended Complaint," an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, and a Certificate of Inmate Trust Account and Authorization, each marked with the cause number assigned to their respective new complaint for their use in complying with this Order. (Clerk Note: Clerk attached appropriate Complaint Form and Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with a Certificate of Inmate Trust Account and Authorization, marked to Plaintiff.) (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 7/11/2022) (krr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Clerk mailed the Amended Complaint form along with a copy of the Motion to Proceed IFP marked with the new case number; along with a Certificate of Inmate Trust Account and 1 Order to Sever. Mon Jul 11 13:33:58 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Clerk mailed NEF to Plaintiff Mon Jul 11 15:17:05 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cheryl Reed. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
