Aguilar v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
Mario Aguilar |
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Warden NFN Ivy and Dr. NFN Odiaka |
5:2022cv00306 |
December 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam R Cummings |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Status Request and Re: Notification of Address Change by Mario Aguilar with Deputy Clerk Response (Attachments: #1 Deputy Clerk Response) (lkw) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Mario Aguilar. New address: TDCJ Allred Unit, 2101 FM 369 North, Iowa Park, TX 76367. (bdg) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Before the Court are Plaintiff s motion for appointment of counsel, (Doc. #2 ), his "(TRO) Motion for Preliminary Injunction," (Doc. #6 ), and his "Motion for Declaration 'Witness Statement."' (Doc. #8 ). As explained below, the motions for counsel and for injunctive relief are DENIED, but Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a supplemental witness statement is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint remains pending judicial screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915, 1915A. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 1/9/2023) (krr) |
Filing 9 FILING FEE DEFICIENCY ORDER: The Court finds that Plaintiff should, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, pay the $402.00 or file with the Clerk the following: A certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. The Clerk shall mail a Certificate of Inmate Trust Account to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 1/9/2023) (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9, 10. Clerk mailed a Certificate of Inmate Trust Account Statement form to Mario Aguilar along with a copy of Order #9 . Mon Jan 9 14:30:03 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 8 MOTION FOR DECLARATION "WITNESS STATEMENT" filed by Mario Aguilar. (krr) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mario Aguilar. (krr) |
Filing 6 (TRO) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Mario Aguilar. (krr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/19/2022: #1 Additional Page(s) Cover Letter) Clerk Note: Cover Letter states that Mr. Aguilar mailed a Notice to Consent with his filings. Clerk e-mailed the Consent on 12/19/2022 as it is a Prisoner NON-CONSENT (krr). |
Filing 5 NOTICE regarding In Forma Pauperis Application filed by Mario Aguilar (lkw) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (lkw) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (lkw) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Mario Aguilar (lkw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Mario Aguilar. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (lkw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Tue Dec 6 10:52:49 CST 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.