General Coatings Manufacturing Corp v. Benchmark Foam Distribution, LLC et al
General Coatings Manufacturing Corp |
Denny S Wilkins, Benchmark Foam Distribution, LLC, Dennis S Wilkins and Dennis Wilkins |
5:2022cv00326 |
December 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Benchmark Foam Distribution, LLC ; served on 2/3/2023. (Cersonsky, Mayer) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Denny S Wilkins ; served on 2/3/2023. (Cersonsky, Mayer) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Benchmark Foam Distribution, LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Philip Andrew Johnson added to party Benchmark Foam Distribution, LLC(pty:dft) (Johnson, Philip) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Denny S Wilkins. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Philip Andrew Johnson added to party Denny S Wilkins(pty:dft) (Johnson, Philip) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Benchmark Foam Distribution, LLC and Denny S Wilkins. (bdg) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by General Coatings Manufacturing Corp. (Cersonsky, Mayer) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by General Coatings Manufacturing Corp. (Cersonsky, Mayer) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT OF AMOUNT DUE re #1 Complaint Exhibit 6 by General Coatings Manufacturing Corp. (Cersonsky, Mayer) Modified text on 12/30/2022 (bdg). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by General Coatings Manufacturing Corp. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13406364) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5) (Cersonsky, Mayer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.