Escobedo v. Terry County Jail et al
| Jonathan Lee Escobedo, Sr. |
| Terry County Jail, Terry County Sheriff's Department, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-136, Terry County Jail Administration and Terry County Medical Department |
| 5:2023cv00136 |
| June 27, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DEFICIENCY SHOW CAUSE ORDER: Plaintiff partially complied with the court's order. He filed his amended complaint with an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but he did not include a certified copy of his inmate trust account with authorization. Thus, the Court finds that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file his certificate of inmate trust account with authorization or file a sworn affidavit or unsworn declaration made under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, setting forth the specific steps he has taken to attempt to comply with the prior order, or his reasons for failing to comply, and attach copies of any relevant consent forms or other supporting information to Plaintiff's sworn affidavit or unsworn declaration. The Clerk will mail Plaintiff a certificate of inmate trust account with authorization along with a copy of this order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/16/2023) (bdg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Also mailed a certificate of inmate trust account with authorization form to Plaintiff. Wed Aug 16 13:20:21 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 8 Prisoner Consent by Jonathan Lee Escobedo, Sr to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bdg) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan Lee Escobedo, Sr (bdg) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Terry County Jail, Terry County Jail Administration, Terry County Medical Department filed by Jonathan Lee Escobedo, Sr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiencies: The complaint was not filed on the court-approved form and neither the $402 filing fee nor a request to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted. Therefore, by July 28, 2023 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) file the civil-rights complaint on the approved form, and (2) pay the $402 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the approved form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk will mail an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a certificate of inmate trust account with authorization, and a prisoner civil-rights complaint form marked "amended," to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/27/2023) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/27/2023) (chmb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (lkw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (lkw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jonathan Lee Escobedo, Sr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (lkw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Tue Jun 27 10:28:03 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Clerk mailed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a certificate of inmate trust account with authorization, and a prisoner civil-rights complaint form marked "amended," to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. Tue Jun 27 13:09:31 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
