Blackburn v. Lubbock FBI et al
| Amy Louise Blackburn |
| Lubbock FBI, John Waters, Sr., John Waters, Jr., Robert Alan Fiel, James Johnson, Roger Pittman and Robert Suddarth |
| 5:2023cv00161 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| D Gordon Bryant |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
OBJECTION filed by Amy Louise Blackburn RE: #7 Order. (krr)
|
|
Filing 10
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, RE: #1 Complaint filed by Amy Louise Blackburn. The undersigned recommends that the United States District Judge (1) dismiss Blackburns's Complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and (2) deny all pending motions. The undersigned recommends that the United States District Judge deny as moot Blackburn's pending motions. ECF Nos. #5 , #6 , #9 . (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. on 8/23/2023) (krr)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Wed Aug 23 09:40:28 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE RE: #8 Response filed by Amy Louise Blackburn. (krr)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE (SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT) filed by Amy Louise Blackburn RE: #7 Order. (krr)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Aug 4 14:26:51 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court ORDERS Blackburn to supplement her Complaint, no later than August 11, 2023, alleging with specificity the facts necessary to establish the Court's subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Alternatively, Blackburn may invoke other grounds for this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1331. Blackburn's failure to comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further notice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. on 7/31/2023) (krr)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Jul 31 16:21:52 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Amy Louise Blackburn. (krr)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amy Louise Blackburn. (krr)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amy Louise Blackburn. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (krr)
|
|
Filing 2
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Amy Louise Blackburn (case filed over the counter). Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (krr)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4,5,6. Thu Jul 27 15:30:44 CDT 2023 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
