Casias v. Lubbock County, Texas
| James Casias |
| Lubbock County, Texas |
| 5:2023cv00172 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Consent by James Casias to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bdg) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bdg) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his civil-rights complaint. Dkt. No. #6 . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) permits a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer. The Court finds that Plaintiff 's motion serves as a self-executing notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a). This case will be closed, and any pending motions will be terminated. Plaintiff is advised that if he refiles his complaint, he must submit his complaint on the court-approved form for prisoner civil-rights cases, and he must pay the $402.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified statement of his inmate trust account. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/8/2023) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal filed by James Casias. (bdg) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by James Casias (bdg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Casias (bdg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lubbock County, Texas filed by James Casias. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (bdg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,4,5. Tue Aug 8 11:12:23 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Aug 8 16:35:30 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Casias v. Lubbock County, Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Casias | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lubbock County, Texas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
