Garza v. Lubbock County Detention Center et al
| Albert Garza, Jr. |
| Lubbock County Detention Center, FNU Havran and FNU Reddick |
| 5:2024cv00009 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff did not pay the $405 filing fee. He filed a certificate of his inmate trust account, but he did not submit a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Therefore, by March 25, 2024 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $405 filing fee or file a signed application to proceed IFP. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk will mail an IFP application to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/23/2024) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/23/2024) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Clerk also mailed an IFP Application to Plaintiff along with these Electronic Orders. Fri Feb 23 13:00:26 CST 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Albert Garza, Jr. New address: 13055 FM 3522 Abilene, TX 79601. (jdh) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Trust Account by Albert Garza, Jr LCDC # 108979. (jdh) Modified on 1/5/2024 (jdh). |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jdh) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jdh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Albert Garza. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jdh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Fri Jan 5 13:26:54 CST 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
