RT Franklin Holdings, LLC et al v. Steele West Texas Capital Corporation, et al
RT Franklin Holdings, LLC and Christina Chapman |
Steele West Texas Capital Corporation, American State Bank and Steele Bancshares, Inc. |
5:2024cv00042 |
February 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Contract: Stockholders' Suits |
28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK Case |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION filed by Christina Chapman, RT Franklin Holdings, LLC re: #14 MOTION to Stay Defendant American State Bank's Motion For Discretionary Stay and Brief In Support (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pepe, Jason) Modified text on 3/29/2024 (bdg). |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Joinder in American State Bank's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Reman re: #16 Response/Objection filed by Steele Bancshares, Inc. (Beck, David) |
Filing 17 Appendix in Support filed by American State Bank re #16 Response/Objection - APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AMERICAN STATE BANK'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND (Bowen, James) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by American State Bank re: #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Bowen, James) |
Filing 15 REPLY filed by American State Bank re: #5 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division (Bowen, James) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Defendant American State Bank's Motion For Discretionary Stay and Brief In Support filed by American State Bank with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bowen, James) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Grayson L Linyard terminated. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 3/1/2024) (bdg) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Joinder re: #5 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by Steele Bancshares, Inc. (Beck, David) |
Filing 11 Appendix in Support filed by Christina Chapman, RT Franklin Holdings, LLC re #10 Response/Objection, #5 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division (Barton, Jared) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by Christina Chapman, RT Franklin Holdings, LLC re: #5 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division (Barton, Jared) |
Filing 9 Appendix in Support filed by Christina Chapman, RT Franklin Holdings, LLC re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Barton, Jared) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Christina Chapman, RT Franklin Holdings, LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Barton, Jared) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Grayson L. Linyard filed by American State Bank (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Linyard, Grayson) |
Filing 6 Appendix in Support filed by American State Bank re #5 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division (Bowen, James) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by American State Bank with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bowen, James) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case filed by American State Bank (Bowen, James) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American State Bank. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Bowen, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by American State Bank. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14364349) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 EX 1 - Bankruptcy Filing, #4 EX 2-Index of Exhibits, #5 EX 3-Original Petition, #6 EX 4-ASB & SBI Answer, #7 EX 5-SWTCC Answer, #8 EX 6-Scheduling Order, #9 EX 7-ASB Special Exceptions, #10 EX 8-SBI Special Exceptions, #11 EX 9-ASB & SBI Objection to Deposition, #12 EX 10-SWTCC Motion to Withdraw, #13 EX 11-Order Granting Motion to Withdraw, #14 EX 12-SBI Motion or Withdrawal & Substitution of Counsel, #15 EX 13-Order Granting SBI Withdrawal & Substitution of Counsel, #16 EX 14-ASB Motion for Summary Judgment, #17 EX 15-ASB Appendix in Support of MSJ, #18 EX 16-Order Setting Hearing on ASB MSJ, #19 EX 17-Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, #20 EX 18-Order Granting Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, #21 EX 19-Motion to Continue MSJ Hearing, #22 EX 20-Order Granting Motion to Continue MSJ Hearing, #23 EX 21-ASB Response to Motion to Continue MSJ Hearing, #24 EX 22-ASB Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Motion to Continue MSJ Hearing, #25 EX 23- Court's Docket for Notice of Removal, #26 EX 24-Franklin Certificate of Interested Persons_Disclosure Statement) (Bowen, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.