Johnson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jasonlyn Johnson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 5:2024cv00046
Filed: February 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee Ann Reno
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2024 Filing 10 Administrative Record consisting of Social Security record filed by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (Kemp, Kerry)
February 9, 2024 Filing 9 Social Security Consent filed by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Clerk to review the consent form and reassign the case to a district judge if appropriate.) (Kemp, Kerry).
February 9, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kerry J Kemp on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Kemp, Kerry)
February 9, 2024 Filing 7 Social Security Consent filed by Jasonlyn Johnson. (Clerk to review the consent form and reassign the case to a district judge if appropriate.) (Dunn, Jennifer).
February 8, 2024 Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for the parties submit filings: Defendant must file the administrative record and its answer on or before April 8, 2024. Plaintiff's brief is due within 30 days after the answer is filed. Within thirty (30) days after service of Plaintiff's brief, Defendant shall serve on Plaintiff and file with the Court a brief that specifically addresses each issue raised by Plaintiff. Within fourteen (14) days of service of Defendant's brief, Plaintiff may serve on Defendant and file with the Court a brief in reply to Defendant's brief. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 2/8/2024) (bdg)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 2/8/2024) (bdg)
February 8, 2024 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jasonlyn Johnson. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Dunn, Jennifer)
February 8, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jasonlyn Johnson (Dunn, Jennifer)
February 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration filed by Jasonlyn Johnson. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Complaint NEF sent to SSA OGC and to TXND USAO.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex. A - Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Dunn, Jennifer) Modified docket text on 2/9/2024 (mms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasonlyn Johnson
Represented By: Jennifer Latstetter Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Kerry J Kemp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?