Galindo v. Dawson County et al
| Ray Galindo |
| Dawson County and FNU Solis |
| 5:2024cv00060 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDESIGNATE CASE: After reviewing Plaintiffs complaint, the Court finds that he does not challenge the conditions of his confinement. Instead, he challenges the validity of his arrest and the currentcharges pending against him. The Court finds that the essence of Plaintiffs complaint is a challenge to the fact of his confinement and that his request for compensation is a secondary form of relief. The primary relief that Plaintiff seeks is available only under the habeas corpus statutes. Therefore, Plaintiff must respond to this order, indicating either his acceptance of or objection to the Court's intended construction of this case within 20 days. Clerk mailed Plaintiff a Section 2241 form marked with this case number. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 4/1/2024) (bmh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Clerk mailed Plaintiff a Section 2241 form marked with this case number. Mon Apr 1 16:22:35 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Trust Account by Ray Galindo. (bmh) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ray Galindo. (bmh) |
| Filing 9 Resident Transaction Details and Average Resident Balance Statement filed by Ray Galindo Dawson County Jail Resident ID # 28202. (jdh) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against FNU Solis filed by Ray Galindo. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jdh) (Main Document 8 replaced on 3/15/2024) (jdh). |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Consent by Ray Galindo to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bmh) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiencies: The complaint was not filed on the court-approved form and neither the $405 filing fee nor a request to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted. Therefore, by March 29, 2024 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) file the civil-rights complaint on the approved form, and (2) pay the $405 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the approved form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk will mail an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a certificate of inmate trust account with authorization, and a prisoner civil-rights complaint form marked "amended," to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/28/2024) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/28/2024) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jdh) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jdh) |
| Filing 2 *DISREGARD, DUPLICATE* New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jdh) Modified on 2/27/2024 (jdh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ray Galindo. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jdh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3,4. Tue Feb 27 10:11:49 CST 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
