Vasquez v. Ho et al
| Jaime Noel Vasquez |
| Peter Ho and Texas Tech Mental Health Providers |
| 5:2024cv00080 |
| March 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bmh) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bmh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jaime Noel Vasquez. (bmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jaime Noel Vasquez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bmh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Tue Mar 26 10:20:55 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
