Bailey v. Rowe et al
| Trenity Bailey |
| Kelly S. Rowe and Lubbock County Task Force |
| 5:2024cv00186 |
| August 14, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Lee Ann Reno |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Administrative Record re: #9 Order for Authenticated Records received from City of Lubbock and maintained in Judge (LAR) chambers. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 11
Plaintiff's Witness List by Trenity Bailey. (bdg)
|
|
Administrative Record re: #9 Order for Authenticated Records received from Lubbock County District Attorneys' Office and maintained in Judge (LAR) chambers. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 10
Prisoner Consent by Trenity Bailey to Trial by Magistrate Judge. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR AUTHENTICATED RECORDS: It is therefore ORDERED that the entities and/or officials listed in this Order shall provide the Court with authenticated and verified copies of any and all pertaining to the specific allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint records (including, but not limited to, medical records, grievance records, disciplinary records, video recordings, shift records for the relevant time records reflecting officers on duty at the time of the alleged incident), to: Staff Attorney, Amarillo Division. An authorized custodian of the records must execute the attached Certification of Business Records ("Certification") and attach the executed Certification to the records provided to the Court. The records and executed Certification must be returned to the Court on or before September 23, 2024. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order and Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) to the listed addresses. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 8/23/2024) (bdg)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Also mailed a copy of Order - Doc. No. 9 and complaint to Lubbock Police Department - Records Department, Lubbock City Attorney's Office - Assistant City Attorney, LCDC - Records Department and Assistant District Attorney- Lubbock County Courthouse. Fri Aug 23 14:08:21 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TRANSFERRING THE CASE TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After an initial review under 28 U.S.C. 1915, the Court is of the opinion that this case should be transferred to the docket of the Honorable Lee Ann Reno, United States Magistrate Judge, for further proceedings. This case will now be numbered Civil Action No. 5:24-CV-00186-BR. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno for all further proceedings. Judge James Wesley Hendrix no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/16/2024) (bdg)
|
|
Filing 7
PLRA FILING FEE ORDER: Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Trenity Bailey shall pay $350.00 in monthly installments as mandated by the PLRA. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/16/2024) (bdg)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Also mailed copy of Order - Doc. No. 7 to LCDC - Accounting Officer. Fri Aug 16 16:33:30 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/15/2024) (chmb)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Mailed copy of NEF - Doc No. 6. Thu Aug 15 10:33:02 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg)
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 3
Certificate of Trust Account by Trenity Bailey LCDC # 111031. (bdg)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Trenity Bailey (bdg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Trenity Bailey. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,4,5. Wed Aug 14 11:40:35 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
