Welsh v. Fennel et al
| Lonnie Kade Welsh |
| Jose Cardenas, D. Saenz, Chapo Rodriguez and Kendrick Fennel |
| 5:2024cv00201 |
| September 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Detainee-Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Sep 13 08:51:50 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Civil Case Closed per Order 6 . (bmh) |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his civil-rights complaint. Dkt. No. 5. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) permits a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer. The Court finds that Plaintiff 's motion serves as a self-executing notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a). The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. Plaintiff is advised that if he refiles his complaint, he must submit his complaint on the court-approved form for prisoner civil-rights cases, and he must pay the $405.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified statement of his inmate trust account. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/12/2024) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lonnie Kade Welsh. (jdh) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff did not pay the $405 filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis with a statement of his resident trust account. Therefore, by October 7, 2024 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $405 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the approved form with a resident account statement. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk will mail a non-prisoner form application to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. It is Plaintiff's responsibility to obtain a resident account statement from his detention facility. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/5/2024) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Sep 5 11:31:22 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jdh) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jdh) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/3/2024) (jdh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Lonnie Kade Welsh. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jdh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Tue Sep 3 09:59:29 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
