Curry v. Robertson Unit Doctor et al
Plaintiff: Tony Canandus Curry
Defendant: 2004 Robertson Unit, Holiday Unit, Montford Unit Xray Examiner and Gib Lewis Unit
Case Number: 5:2025cv00128
Filed: June 16, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Court's order entered today, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this civil-rights complaint is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/30/2025) (bdg)
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: This case cannot proceed without either payment of the filing fee or submission of the documents required for an IFP determination. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and (b). Plaintiff has been given ample opportunity to comply with the Court's orders, but he has failed to do so. And Plaintiff has shown no interest in pursuing his claims since his case was transferred here. As a result, the Court finds that this case must be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b). Judgment will be entered accordingly. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/30/2025) (bdg)
September 30, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11,12. Tue Sep 30 16:05:26 CDT 2025 (crt)
June 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff did not pay the $405 filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis with a certificate of his inmate trust account. Therefore, by July 17, 2025 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $405 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the approved form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The required forms are available in the law library of Plaintiffs current prison unit. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/17/2025) (chmb)
June 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/17/2025) (chmb)
June 17, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Mailed copy NEF - Doc. No. 9, 10. Tue Jun 17 14:21:12 CDT 2025 (crt)
June 16, 2025 Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cjd)
June 16, 2025 Filing 7 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:25-cv-01812. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.
June 16, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Copy of NEF #7 mailed. Mon Jun 16 15:47:03 CDT 2025 (crt)
June 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]
June 10, 2025 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ON TRANSFER re: This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]
May 12, 2025 Filing 4 INCOMPLETE CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Tony Canandus Curry, filed. (dah4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]
April 22, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmn4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]
April 22, 2025 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]
April 22, 2025 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bmn4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]
April 21, 2025 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Tony Canandus Curry. (bmn4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 6/16/2025.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curry v. Robertson Unit Doctor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Canandus Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 2004 Robertson Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holiday Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montford Unit Xray Examiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gib Lewis Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?