Bates v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Kevin Bates |
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 5:2025cv00196 |
| September 23, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 UNAUTHORIZED SUPPLEMENT filed by Kevin Bates. (bdg) |
| Filing 13 REPLY filed by Kevin Bates to #10 Response to Habeas Petition. (bdg) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Goettert, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 Administrative Record consisting of State court papers filed by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Attachments: #1 SHCR-01 (action taken) 25-08-13, #2 SHCR-01 (action taken) 25-08-27, #3 SHCR-01 (inmate info), #4 SHCR-01 (writ), #5 SHCR-02 (action taken), #6 SHCR-02 (inmate info), #7 SHCR-02 (inmate info), #8 SHCR-02 (pro se objections), #9 SHCR-02 (writ)) (Goettert, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, filed by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)Attorney Elizabeth A Goettert added to party Director, TDCJ-CID(pty:res) (Goettert, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9
Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. Respondent is directed to file an answer to Petitioner's petition pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court within 60 days from the date of this order. Petitioner may file a response to Respondent's answer within 30 days from the date shown on Respondent's certificate of service. The clerk will electronically serve this order, the petition, and supporting documents to the designee for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/5/2025) (bdg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Wed Nov 5 16:03:20 CST 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Petitioner's motion for extension of time to cure the filing-fee deficiency, Dkt. No. #6 is DENIED as moot. The Court granted Petitioners timely request to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 7 . (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/16/2025) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt No. #5 , is GRANTED until further order. Reminder: Petitioner must promptly notify the Court of any change of address by filing a written notice of change of address with the Clerk. Failure to file this notice may result in the dismissal of the petition for failure to prosecute. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/16/2025) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Mailed copy NEF - Doc. No. 7 and 8. Thu Oct 16 13:53:20 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for an Extension of Time filed by Kevin Bates. (cjd) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS with certificate of trust account filed by Kevin Bates. (cjd) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certificate of inmate trust account by October 24, 2025 (30 days). Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Forms necessary to comply with this order are available in the law library of the prison unit in which Petitioner is confined. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/24/2025) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Mailed copy NEF - Doc. No. 4. Wed Sep 24 16:26:38 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cjd) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (cjd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kevin Bates. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cjd) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3. Tue Sep 23 10:25:41 CDT 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bates v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kevin Bates | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth A Goettert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
