Toson v. Gallegos et al
| Durand Toson |
| E. Gallegos, FNU Ramon, Jane Doe, FNU Gomez, FNU Hudson, FNU Bohon, FNU Hernandez and FNU Flores |
| 5:2025cv00199 |
| September 26, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT : For the reasons stated in the Court's order entered today, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Plaintiff's civil-rights complaint is dismissed without prejudice under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/15/2025) (bmh)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: For the reasons discussed above, the Court finds that Plaintiff is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and he failed to show that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed his complaint. The Court therefore orders: l. Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. 2. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).3. Any other pending motions are denied. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/15/2025) (bmh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Wed Oct 15 09:26:50 CDT 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING OR-DER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address infor-mation may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/10/2025) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Oct 10 11:01:53 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 5 SUBSEQUENT FILED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS with certificate of trust account filed by Durand Toson. (cjd) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Durand Toson. (cjd) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (cjd) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (cjd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Durand Toson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (cjd) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3,4. Fri Sep 26 10:58:40 CDT 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
