Inglet v. Astrue

Inglet v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Alton M. Inglet, Jr.
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	6:2008cv00014
Filed:	March 31, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Brown
Presiding Judge:	Philip R Lane
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 17, 2009	Filing 30 ORDER - ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations, the cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. Section 405(g). Upon remand the ALJ should clearly consider each of the six factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. Section 404.1527(d)(2) and/or consider whether to obtain or update an opinion of a treating or examining physician regarding Plaintiff's impairments and limitations. (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/17/09) (jkl)
August 28, 2009	Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to MICHAEL J. ASTRUE - This Court recommends that the United States district judge reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with this recommendation. Plaintiff h aving refused consent to having the US magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, this case is TRANSFERRED back to the docket of the US district judge. See document for specifics. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane on 08/28/2009) (dss) Modified on 8/31/2009 (jkl).

Date Filed

Document Text

September 17, 2009

Filing 30 ORDER - ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations, the cause is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. Section 405(g). Upon remand the ALJ should clearly consider each of the six factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. Section 404.1527(d)(2) and/or consider whether to obtain or update an opinion of a treating or examining physician regarding Plaintiff's impairments and limitations. (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/17/09) (jkl)

August 28, 2009

Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to MICHAEL J. ASTRUE - This Court recommends that the United States district judge reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with this recommendation. Plaintiff h aving refused consent to having the US magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, this case is TRANSFERRED back to the docket of the US district judge. See document for specifics. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane on 08/28/2009) (dss) Modified on 8/31/2009 (jkl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Inglet v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alton M. Inglet, Jr.
Represented By:	Marianna E McKnight
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?