Lewis v. Astrue

Lewis v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Mack R. Lewis
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	6:2008cv00036
Filed:	July 7, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Tom Green
Presiding Judge:	Philip R Lane
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 19, 2010	Filing 22 ORDER: the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation 21 are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that this causeis reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the ALJ should further consider and explain the weight given to the opinion of the treating physicians and the limitations imposed by Plaintiffs impairments on his ability to perform work activity. (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 2/19/2010) (dsr)
February 2, 2010	Filing 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS on case: Based upon the foregoing discussion of the issues, the evidence, and the law, this court recommends that the United States district judge reverse the Commissioners decision and remandthis case for further procee dings in accordance with this recommendation.Plaintiff having refused consent to having the United States magistrate judge conduct allfurther proceedings in this case, this case is TRANSFERRED back to the docket of the United States district judge. Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane on 2/2/2010) (dsr)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 19, 2010

Filing 22 ORDER: the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation 21 are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that this causeis reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the ALJ should further consider and explain the weight given to the opinion of the treating physicians and the limitations imposed by Plaintiffs impairments on his ability to perform work activity. (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 2/19/2010) (dsr)

February 2, 2010

Filing 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS on case: Based upon the foregoing discussion of the issues, the evidence, and the law, this court recommends that the United States district judge reverse the Commissioners decision and remandthis case for further procee dings in accordance with this recommendation.Plaintiff having refused consent to having the United States magistrate judge conduct allfurther proceedings in this case, this case is TRANSFERRED back to the docket of the United States district judge. Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Philip R Lane on 2/2/2010) (dsr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mack R. Lewis
Represented By:	Elizabeth B Dunlap
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?