Rodriguez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Reynaldo Flores Rodriguez |
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
6:2020cv00085 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
John R Parker |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration- U.S. Attorney General ; served on 9/10/2020. (Honig, Ronald) Modified text on 9/17/2020 (pnp). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Honig, Ronald) Modified text on 9/17/2020 (pnp). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration- U.S. Attorney; served on 9/8/2020. (Honig, Ronald) Modified text on 9/17/2020 (pnp). |
Filing 7 Summons(es) Issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration. (pnp) (Main Document 7 replaced, due to court seal missing on 9/3/2020) (pnp). |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Reynaldo Flores Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Honig, Ronald) |
Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that 1. Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis Dkt. No. #3 is GRANTED. The clerk shall file Plaintiffs pleadings without prepayment of costs or security; 2. Plaintiff shall complete the Summons in a Civil Case form for each Defendant and submit it to the clerk; 3. Upon receipt from the Plaintiff, the clerk shall issue the summons and return it to the Plaintiff for service on the Defendant; 4. Plaintiff shall perfect service on the Defendant as instructed by this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 9/2/2020) (pnp) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Parker (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (pnp) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Reynaldo Flores Rodriguez (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s)) (Honig, Ronald) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Reynaldo Flores Rodriguez. (Honig, Ronald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Reynaldo Flores Rodriguez. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Honig, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.