Tiemann v. General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff: Thomas Lynn Tiemann
Defendant: General Motors, LLC
Case Number: 6:2020cv00093
Filed: September 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Having reviewed the docket in this case, the Court notes that Tiemann has not complied with the Court's order and has not obtained local counsel or filed a motion to proceed without local counsel. Tiemann is therefore ordered to obtain local counsel or file a motion to proceed without local counsel by November 2, 2020. If Tiemann again fails to comply with the Court's order, the Court will issue a show-cause order requiring Tiemann to explain why sanctions should not issue for his failure to comply. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/19/2020) (pnp)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the docket in this case, notes that Thomas Lynn Tiemann is not in compliance with the local-counsel requirement set out by this Court's Local Civil Rules. Tiemann is therefore ordered to obtain local counsel or file a motion to proceed without local counsel by October 9, 2020. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/24/2020) (pnp)
September 8, 2020 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (pnp)
September 4, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to General Motors, LLC. (pnp)
September 4, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Thomas Lynn Tiemann. (Dalton, Richard)
September 4, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against General Motors, LLC filed by Thomas Lynn Tiemann. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11147433) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Dalton, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tiemann v. General Motors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Lynn Tiemann
Represented By: Richard Collins Dalton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?