Davis v. United States of America
| James William Davis |
| United States of America |
| 6:2023cv00064 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 4, 5. Mailed to James William Davis at BOP Beaumont FCI - Low on Thu Oct 26 11:24:05 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 6
FINAL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Court's order dismissing plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. No. 5, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that: The plaintiff's claims against the government are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/25/2023) (dsr)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Return of Property, which the Court construed as a civil complaint for return of property. For the reasons stated in the government's response #3 , the Court dismisses the complaint for failure to state a claim. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/25/2023) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 6. mailed to James William Davis #58136-509, BOP Beaumont FCI - Low, PO Box 26020, Beaumont, TX 77720-6020 Wed Oct 25 15:31:02 CDT 2023 (crt) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER as to James William Davis: The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the Motion for Return of Property 41 in the criminal case, open a new prisoner civil action against the United States under 28 U.S.C. 1331 (nature of suit 540) with direct assignment to District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, and file the Motion for Return of Property 41 as a civil complaint in that case along with the Electronic Order 42, and the Government's Response to Defendant's Motion 43, and a copy of this order. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/24/2023) (chmb) (dsr)
|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE filed by United States of America re: 2 Order. (dsr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Return of Property against United States of America filed by James William Davis. (dsr) |
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC ORDER as to James William Davis: Government Response due by 10/23/2023. Re: 1 MOTION for Return of Property (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 7/27/2023) (chmb) (dsr) (Entered: 10/24/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James William Davis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Lloyd Tusing-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
