Ashlock v. Coke County Sheriff's Office et al
| Calvin Lee Ashlock |
| Coke County Sheriff's Office, Coke County, Coke County District Attorney's Office, Tom Green County Sheriff's Office, Tom Green County and Tom Green County Public Defender's Office |
| 6:2023cv00067 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail returned as undeliverable. Order Receipt received back from Calvin Ashlock as Not in this jail - Return to sender from TGC Detention Facility. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (ada) |
Filing 9
JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the Court's order of even date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/20/2023) (ada)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER. Plaintiff did not use the required form, pay the filing fee, or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with a certified copy of his inmate trust account. The Court, therefore, finds that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/20/2023) (ada)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9. Mailed to Calvin Lee Ashlock at Tom Green County Detention Facility on Wed Dec 20 11:09:05 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. Order Receipt received back from Calvin Ashlock as Not in this jail - TGC Detention Facility. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (ada) |
| Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. #3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party, #2 Notice and Election Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, received back from Calvin Lee Ashlock as Not in this Jail; Released 11/9/23. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (dsr) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiencies: The complaint was not filed on the court-approved form and neither the $402 filing fee nor a request to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted. Therefore, by December 13, 2023 (30 days), Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) file the civil-rights complaint on the approved form, and (2) pay the $402 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the approved form with the required certificate of inmate trust account. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk will mail an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a certificate of inmate trust account with authorization, and a prisoner civil-rights complaint form marked "amended," to Plaintiff along with a copy of this order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 11/13/2023) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 11/13/2023) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mailed to Calvin Lee Ashlock at Tom Green County Detention Facility on Mon Nov 13 14:58:36 CST 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Mailed to Calvin Lee Ashlock at Tom Green County Detention Facility on Thu Nov 9 10:41:23 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ada) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ada) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Calvin Lee Ashlock. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ada) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
