Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McDonald
| Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company |
| Patrick McDonald |
| 6:2025cv00044 |
| May 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Before the Court is plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice, which the Court construes as a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Dkt No. #6 . Because defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the Court instructs the Clerk of Court to dismiss this action without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/5/2025) (grl)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (Inman, Sara) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Patrick McDonald. (grl) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons to Defendant filed by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (Inman, Sara) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (grl) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Inman, Sara) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Patrick McDonald filed by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-15508896) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s)) (Inman, Sara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McDonald | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Sara E Inman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Patrick McDonald | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
