Inge v. Astrue

Inge v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Robin Inge
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	7:2009cv00095
Filed:	June 17, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Wichita Falls Office
County:	Wichita
Presiding Judge:	Reed C O'Connor
Presiding Judge:	Wm F Sanderson
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 16, 2010	Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations. After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 17) and Plaintiffs Objection thereto (D ocs. 18), in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By se parate judgment, the Court formally dismisses this action. (RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that the District Court enter its order AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner and its judgment DISMISSING this action with prejudice. A copy of this recommendation shall be transmitted to counsel for the parties.) (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 6/16/2010) (ttm)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 16, 2010

Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations. After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 17) and Plaintiffs Objection thereto (D ocs. 18), in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By se parate judgment, the Court formally dismisses this action. (RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that the District Court enter its order AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner and its judgment DISMISSING this action with prejudice. A copy of this recommendation shall be transmitted to counsel for the parties.) (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 6/16/2010) (ttm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Inge v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Inge
Represented By:	Carey Warrick Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?