Cardona v. Arias et al
| Enrique Cardona |
| NFN Arias, Orlando Taylor and Timothy Denney |
| 7:2011cv00013 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Wichita Falls Office |
| Wichita |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court finds that, due to the numerous claims, numerous Defendants, and voluminous pleadings filed in this action, judicial efficiency will be served by severing Plaintiffs claims of (1) excessive force, (2) delibera te indifference, and (3) failure to intervene and stop the use of force from this case and opening a new civil action. The Clerk of Court shall open a new case styled Cardona v. Taylor. The Defendants are Orlando Taylor, Timothy Denney, Lt. Burton, S gt. Capps, Miguel Alvarado, and Rebecca Shults. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims of retaliation, denial of medical care, breach of TDCJ guidelines, conspiracy, and false disciplinary action are DISMISSED. It is further ordered that Defendants Ar ias, Fox, Gonzalez, Boyle, Harris, Norwood, and Williams are DISMISSED as parties to this action. To the extent, if any, that Plaintiff presents claims cognizable in a federal habeas proceeding, such claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 3/31/2014) (trt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
