United States of America v. Boyle et al
United States of America |
Joseph Charles Boyle and Sandra Kay Baker |
7:2017cv00030 |
March 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Wichita Falls Office |
Anderson |
Reed C. O'Connor |
Hal R. Ray |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the United States" Motion to Apply Proceeds of Sale (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED. The proceeds from the sale of the r eal property at 512 North Bois DArc Street, Holliday, Texas 76366 are to be applied first to the payment of closing costs, local real and personal property taxes and fees, and the Receiver's commission and expenses, as set forth in the Final Closing Statement. The remainder of the proceeds are to be paid to the Clerk of the Court and applied to the unpaid restitution debt of Joseph Charles Boyle in the related case of United States v. Joseph Charles Boyle, No. 7:15-CR-00019-O (N.D. Tex.). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/10/2017) (skg) |
Filing 16 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is therefore ORDERED that the United States' Motion for Confirmation of Sale (ECF No. 11 ) is GRANTED. See Order for further specifics. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/19/2017) (skg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.