Clark v. State of Oklahoma
| William Jay Clark |
| State of Oklahoma |
| 7:2018cv00169 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Hal R Ray |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Document titled "Mootion for Leave to File Extra Pages" filed as correspondence by William Jay Clark. (Attachments: #1 Deputy Clerk's response) (skg) |
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: It is therefore ORDERED that the case be, and it is hereby, TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Oklahoma. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 11/27/2018) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Nov 27 12:05:16 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Interdistrict Transfer to Eastern District of Oklahoma.; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Eastern District of Oklahoma. (skg) |
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Eastern District of Oklahoma as case number 6:18-cv-00382. (trt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: No court file needed. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ray (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Extra Pages With Application filed by William Jay Clark. (skg) |
| Filing 2 Memorandum in Support filed by William Jay Clark re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (skg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Jay Clark. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number WF002695) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (skg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mon Nov 26 16:50:42 CST 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. State of Oklahoma | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Jay Clark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Oklahoma | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
