Hardamon v. Duke et al
Plaintiff: Cornelius Neal Hardamon
Defendant: David Duke and Sgt Walker
Case Number: 7:2019cv00084
Filed: July 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Cornelius Neal Hardamon. New address: Cornelius Neal Hardamon TDCJ No 02219208 TDCJ Smith Unit 1313 County Road 19 Lamesa, TX 79331. (skg)
August 5, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Cornelius Neal Hardamon. (skg)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Cornelius Neal Hardamon must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has failed to submit a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 8/7/2019. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/9/2019) (skg)
July 9, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Jul 9 15:36:44 CDT 2019 (crt)
July 8, 2019 Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg)
July 8, 2019 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg)
July 8, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Cornelius Neal Hardamon. (skg)
July 8, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Cornelius Neal Hardamon. (skg)
July 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cornelius Neal Hardamon. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (skg)
July 8, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mon Jul 8 11:38:36 CDT 2019 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardamon v. Duke et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cornelius Neal Hardamon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?