Gregory v Ball, et al
Matthew Wayne Gregory and Rufus Pumponius Praxus |
USSEF Phillips and Mark Ball |
7:2019cv00094 |
August 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Matthew Wayne Gregory. ***Page 2 and 3 missing from mailing.*** (skg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Matthew Wayne Gregory. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. ***Page 3 missing from mailing.*** (skg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Wed Aug 14 14:18:20 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.