Spence v. Parrack et al
| Donald Lee Spence |
| Justin Dwayne Henderson, Easy Rent Appliance Rental and Anthony Roy Parrack |
| 7:2019cv00114 |
| October 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Request for Copy of Court Rules by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12, 13, 14, 15. Thu Nov 21 10:57:23 CST 2019 (crt) |
Filing 15
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/20/2019) (skg)
|
|
Filing 14
Order: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/20/2019) (skg)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Amend/Correct. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/20/2019) (skg)
|
|
Filing 12
FILING FEE ORDER: The agency having custody of plaintiff shall, when funds exist in plaintiff's inmate trust account or institutional equivalent, forward to the Court an initial partial filing fee of $102.00. Plaintiff shall pay $248.00 in monthly installments as mandated by the PLRA. (Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order.) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/20/2019) (skg)
|
| Filing 11 Declaration of Duane D. Outlaw filed by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Linda J Outlaw filed by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| Filing 9 "Genuine Issue of Material Facts in Support of Memorandum of Law" filed by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| Filing 8 "Amended Complaint to Amend" filed by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) |
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by Donald Lee Spence. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (skg) |
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents filed by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Donald Lee Spence. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s)) (skg) |
| Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Donald Lee Spence. (skg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Donald Lee Spence. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 proposed summons) (skg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Fri Oct 4 15:31:48 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
