Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: John Derreck Williams
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 7:2020cv00148
Filed: November 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Referring Judge: Hal R Ray
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Derreck Williams. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that United States District Judge Reed OConnor DISMISS Plaintiff's Petition without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 1/13/2021) (trt)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Jan 13 13:41:06 CST 2021 (crt)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order and Notice of Deficiency: John Derreck Williams must address the following deficiency: pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a completed certified trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 12/30/2020. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 11/30/2020) (trt)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Nov 30 09:46:12 CST 2020 (crt)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (skg)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ray (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Derreck Williams. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (skg)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Wed Nov 25 15:42:31 CST 2020 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Derreck Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?