Cobos v. Doe 7:21-cv-102-O
| Christopher Cobos |
| John Doe 7:21-cv-102-O |
| 7:2021cv00102 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION BY THE CLERK OF COURT: Plaintiff is entitled to voluntarily dismiss the case without a Court order under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to administratively close this case pursuant to Plaintiff's #6 Notice of Dismissal. Neither the filing nor the dismissal of this case will count against Plaintiff or preclude any future filing. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/10/2021) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Nov 10 13:57:19 CST 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 6 Correspondence to the Court filed by Christopher Cobos. (bdb) |
| Filing 5 Untitled document addressed to Clerk filed by Christopher Cobos (mmw) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: (see order) Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 11/10/2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/20/2021) (Attachments: #1 complaint, #2 IFP) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. w/ 1983 and IFP Wed Oct 20 10:44:01 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Tue Oct 19 12:43:02 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe 7:21-cv-102-O filed by Christopher Cobos. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cobos v. Doe 7:21-cv-102-O | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Cobos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe 7:21-cv-102-O | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
