Heath v. Abbott et al
Plaintiff: Secial Heath
Defendant: Greg Abbott, Texas Department of Correction, Offender Telephone System, Mike Humperfield, Barry Abbott, David Abbott, David Humperfield and Rutherford Winslow
Case Number: 7:2022cv00010
Filed: February 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2022 Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Secial Heath re: #17 Order on Motion to Withdraw. (sre)
March 28, 2022 Filing 18 Document titled, "Texas Department of Criminal Justice Records Release Authorization" filed by Secial Heath. (sre)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. #16 ) is GRANTED in PART. Plaintiff may reopen this case within 14 days of the date of this order by filing a motion to reopen along with either (1) his certified inmate trust account statement or (2) payment of the $402.00 filing fee. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/22/2022) (sre)
March 22, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:17. Tue Mar 22 13:25:04 CDT 2022 (crt)
March 21, 2022 Filing 16 MOTION to Withdraw IFP filed by Secial Heath. (sre)
March 18, 2022 Filing 15 Public correspondence received from Secial Heath. (sre)
March 16, 2022 Filing 14 Public correspondence received from Secial Heath. (sre)
March 14, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE to the Court Re: Inmate Trust Account filed by Secial Heath. (sre)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT: This action came on for consideration by the Court, and Plaintiff having failed to comply with the Court's order, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/7/2022) (sre)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/7/2022) (sre)
March 7, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11,12. Mon Mar 7 08:32:09 CST 2022 (crt)
March 4, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Secial Heath re: #5 Order And Notice of Deficiency. (sre)
March 4, 2022 Filing 9 Public correspondence received from Secial Heath. (sre)
March 2, 2022 Filing 8 Public correspondence received from Secial Heath. (sre)
February 25, 2022 Filing 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Public correspondence received from Secial Heath. (sre)
February 22, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION titled, "I want a District or a Federal Judge" filed by Secial Heath. (sre)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Secial Heath must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has failed to submit a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis. A request to proceed in forma pauperis must include a statement, certified by an authorized officer of the institution in which Plaintiff is confined, showing Plaintiffs current inmate trust account balance and the average monthly balances and deposits in his inmate trust account for the prior six months.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 3/2/2022. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/9/2022) (sre)
February 9, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Feb 9 14:30:41 CST 2022 (crt)
February 8, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Tue Feb 8 09:11:18 CST 2022 (crt)
February 7, 2022 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre)
February 7, 2022 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Cureton). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre)
February 7, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Secial Heath. (sre)
February 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barry Abbott, David Abbott, Greg Abbott, David Humperfield, Mike Humperfield, Offender Telephone System, Texas Department of Correction, Rutherford Winslow filed by Secial Heath. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heath v. Abbott et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Secial Heath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Offender Telephone System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Humperfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Humperfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rutherford Winslow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?