Springer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Mary L. Springer |
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
7:2023cv00003 |
January 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Hal R Ray |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Designation of Local Counsel (Local Rule 83.10) filed on January 4, 2023. #4 . After considering the Motion and noting Howard D. Olinskys membership in the Bar of the Northern District of Texas, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that Mr. Olinsky may represent Plaintiff without designating local counsel, subject to further order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 1/5/2023) (jgg) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed on January 4, 2023 #2 . After reviewing the motion and applicable legal authorities, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. The clerk shall file Plaintiffs pleadings without prepayment of costs or security therefor. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 1/5/2023) (jgg) |
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: appropriate staff attorney. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ray (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (jgg) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Waive Local Counsel Requirement filed by Mary L. Springer (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo In Support) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mary L. Springer. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mary L. Springer (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Mary L. Springer. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Complaint NEF sent to SSA OGC and to TXND USAO.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.