Pena v. Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
| Christopher Lee Pena |
| Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith, Timothy S. Hooper, Bryan D. Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo, Scott P. Szczepinski, Erika E. Sandoval, Malcolm A. Wise, Jay Hart and Lorena Steinbecker |
| 7:2023cv00014 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/16/2023) (jgg)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED as MOOT. This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to refile the case if and when he returns to the James V. Allred Unit. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/16/2023) (jgg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Thu Mar 16 17:00:36 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Enlargement of Time filed by Christopher Lee Pena (jgg) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Christopher Lee Pena must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis on the District Courts Declaration form along with a certified inmate trust account statement... Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 3/9/2023. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/9/2023) (jgg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Feb 9 12:09:06 CST 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Wed Feb 8 14:23:15 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (saw) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (saw) |
| Filing 2 Memorandum of Law filed by Christopher Lee Pena re #1 Complaint. (saw) Modified docket text on 2/8/2023 (saw). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bryan Collier, Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jay Hart, Timothy S. Hooper, Bryan D. Reitsma, Erika E. Sandoval, Jimmy S. Smith, Lorena Steinbecker, Scott P. Szczepinski, Tina S. Vitolo, Malcolm A. Wise filed by Christopher Lee Pena. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (saw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
