Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
| Jeremy Ladon Busby |
| Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 7:2023cv00093 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division as case number 5:23-cv-01102. (saw) |
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Case transferred to San Antonio Division of Western District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/31/2023) (saw)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Cureton). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER...It is therefore ORDERED that the Request for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 6 ) is severed from the instant case. The Clerk of Court shall open a new Wichita Falls Division prisoner civil rights action. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/31/2023) (wxc)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID filed by Jeremy Ladon Busby. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Thu Aug 31 14:28:02 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Interdistrict Transfer to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.. (saw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeremy Ladon Busby | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
