Sossamon v. Smith et al
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III |
Kevin Smith, Jimmy S. Smith, Christopher Wiedau, Timothy S. Hooper, Bryan D. Reitsma, Christopher L. Cruse, Richard L. Bright, Lisa M. Young, Olayemi I. Monday, Ingrid Y. Ward and Marci J. Odal |
7:2023cv00110 |
October 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) motion (ECF No. #9 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Limited Discovery (ECF No. #8 ) is DISMISSED as MOOT. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/29/2023) (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Wed Nov 29 11:24:25 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III. (bdb) |
Filing 8 Plaintiff's Pro Se Motion for Limited Discovery to Ward Off the District Court's Dismissal and Response to #6 , #7 , filed by Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III. (sre) |
Filing 7 JUDGMENT: This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/2/2023) (sre) |
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the foregoing reasons, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 535-37 (2015); Brown v. Megg, 857 F.3d 287 (5th Cir. 2017). Plaintiff may reopen the case by submitting a motion to reopen and paying the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/2/2023) (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Thu Nov 2 15:04:22 CDT 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Wed Oct 11 10:44:39 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and Prospective Injunction Relief filed by Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III. (bdb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III. (bdb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richard L. Bright, Christopher L. Cruse, Timothy S. Hooper, Olayemi I. Monday, Marci J. Odal, Bryan D. Reitsma, Jimmy S. Smith, Kevin Smith, Ingrid Y. Ward, Christopher Wiedau, Lisa M. Young filed by Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.