Edwards v. Doe 7:23-cv-122-O
| Stephen Edwards |
| John Doe 7:23-cv-122-O |
| 7:2023cv00122 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT : It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/20/2023) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/20/2023) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Wed Dec 20 12:26:02 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Correspondence to the Court filed by Stephen Edwards (mmw) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Stephen Edwards must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff failed to file his complaint on the Courts prisoner civil rights form. Plaintiff has neither paid the Courts filing fee nor submitted a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 12/5/2023. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/15/2023) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Nov 15 15:31:09 CST 2023 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Wed Nov 15 11:46:15 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe 7:23-cv-122-O filed by Stephen Edwards. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edwards v. Doe 7:23-cv-122-O | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen Edwards | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe 7:23-cv-122-O | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
