Mason v. James Allred
| Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens, Joe F Cutney and Unit James V. Allred |
| Deondray Raymond Mason |
| James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 7:2024cv00005 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SEVER AND OPEN NEW CASE: The Clerk of Court is directed to sever and remove the civil-rights complaint and in forma pauperis motion (ECF Nos. #4 and #5 ) from this case, open a new civil cause number nunc pro tunc as of April 11, 2023, and docket the new civil action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. (Case number 7:24-cv-08-O opened) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/19/2024) (bdb)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Fri Jan 19 16:28:00 CST 2024 (crt)
|
|
Filing 9
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdb)
|
|
Filing 8
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 7
Case electronically transferred in from District of New Mexico; Case Number 1:23-cv-00238. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9 w/NEF of 7. Tue Jan 16 11:10:39 CST 2024 (crt) Modified on 1/16/2024 (bdb).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by District Judge Matthew L. Garcia to Transfer this case to the Northern District of Texas, Wichita Falls Division; terminating Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 , #5 and closing this case. (bap) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deondray Raymond Mason. (fs) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT for 1983 Civil Rights against Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens, Joe F Cutney, James V Allred, filed by Deondray Raymond Mason. (fs) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Deondray Raymond Mason. (fs) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deondray Raymond Mason. (jg) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Deondray Raymond Mason. (jg) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
|
United States District Judge Matthew L. Garcia and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg) [Transferred from New Mexico on 1/16/2024.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
