v. Contreras et al
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma, Christopher N. Weidau, Jimmy S. Smith, Kevin B. Smith and TDCJ James Allred Unit
Case Number: 7:2024cv00028
Filed: March 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/5/2024) (wxc)
April 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/5/2024) (wxc)
April 5, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Fri Apr 5 14:00:39 CDT 2024 (crt)
March 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Michael Paul Contreras must address the following deficiency:Plaintiff has neither paid the Court's filing fee nor submitted a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must either pay the $405.00 filing and administrative fees or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis on the District Court's Declaration form along with a certified inmate trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 3/28/2024. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/7/2024) (wxc)
March 7, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Mar 7 14:54:14 CST 2024 (crt)
March 6, 2024 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (saw) Modified docket text on 3/6/2024 (saw).
March 6, 2024 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (saw)
March 6, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Wed Mar 6 15:06:51 CST 2024 (crt)
March 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma, Jimmy S. Smith, Kevin B. Smith, TDCJ James Allred Unit, Christopher N. Weidau filed by Michael Paul Contreras. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (saw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. Contreras et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Contreras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon D. Dishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan D. Reitsma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher N. Weidau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy S. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin B. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TDCJ James Allred Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?