Luedtke v. USA
| Joseph Ray Luedtke |
| USA |
| 7:2024cv00127 |
| September 23, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 : The Government's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #6 ) in which to file a response to Joseph Ray Luedtke's Section 2255 motion is GRANTED. The Government shall file its response by December 26, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/21/2024) (wxc)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Nov 21 10:54:48 CST 2024 (crt)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to 2255 Motion filed by USA (Besosa-Martinez-DOJ, Francisco)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Francisco Besosa-Martinez-DOJ added as AUSA. (Besosa-Martinez-DOJ, Francisco)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES IN A MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255: The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Stephen S Gilstrap-DOJ for USA added. The Court directs the United States Attorney to file an Answer or Response to the instant motion within sixty (60) days. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days., Attorney Stephen S Gilstrap-DOJ for USA added. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/24/2024) (sre)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Sep 24 09:51:16 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc)
|
|
Filing 2
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Joseph Ray Luedtke re #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (wxc)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 7:23-cr-7-O) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc)
|
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. File to: No court file needed. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (wxc)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Mon Sep 23 14:54:44 CDT 2024 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luedtke v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Francisco Besosa-Martinez-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph Ray Luedtke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
