Contreras v. Reitsma et al
| Michael Paul Contreras |
| Sheila McLaughlin, Sarah Chun, Joseph Eastridge, Food Service Kitchen Managers, Kenyon Page, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Employees, Robin Roberts, Pepper Brad Berry, Office of Inspector General Licensed State Police, Bryant D. Reitsma, Michael Crittenden, LVN Pill Nurses, Gabriella Herrera, Sandra Rogers, Amy Newman, Texas Tech Medical Health Sience Center Administration, Melissa Evans, Diana Davis, William Crane, Christopher M. Weidall, Major Joshua S. Taylor, Shannon Jones and Arturo Aguillera |
| 7:2025cv00002 |
| January 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9, 10. Mon Mar 3 09:24:27 CST 2025 (crt) |
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/28/2025) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE : This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/28/2025) (mmw)
|
| Filing 8 Correspondence filed by Michael Paul Contreras (mmw) |
| Filing 7 Untitled document received from Michael Paul Contreras (mmw) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Trust Account by Michael Paul Contreras TDCJ #02401880. (mmw) |
| Filing 5 Correspondence received from Michael Paul Contreras (mmw) |
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Michael Paul Contreras must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff must file a Complaint using the Courts prisoner civil rights form. Plaintiff has neither paid the Courts filing fee nor submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 2/14/2025. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/24/2025) (Attachments: #1 1983, #2 IFP, #3 1983, #4 IFP) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Jan 24 14:23:22 CST 2025 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Fri Jan 10 14:19:36 CST 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (No magistrate judge assigned). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael Paul Contreras. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
